Mats Rosenkranz vs Hamish Stewart Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the last six months, Stewart slightly edges Rosenkranz in second serve points won, achieving 47.6% compared to 46.94% for Rosenkranz.
• Return Game Strength: In returning opponents' second serves, Rosenkranz is more effective, winning 44.23% while Stewart manages 42.47%. On first serves, however, Stewart has a small advantage with 23.45% against Rosenkranz's 22.84%.
• Handling Breakpoints: Stewart excels under pressure, saving 54.74% of breakpoints faced recently, while Rosenkranz saves 52.4%.
• Annual Match Performance: Over the past year, Stewart has a superior match win percentage at 67.5% (54/26), compared to Rosenkranz’s 61.73% (50/31).
• Surface Preference: Rosenkranz performs best on grass with a 60% win rate, contrasting with Stewart’s preference for indoor hard surfaces, achieving 70% wins.
• Tournament Level and Wins: In the last year, Stewart has successfully competed mostly in Futures/ITF $10K tournaments, winning 70.49% of matches, whereas Rosenkranz participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 51.22%.
• Opponent Ranks: Rosenkranz’s opponents have had a higher average rank (362.75) compared to those Stewart faced (410.25).
• Deciding Set Performance: Rosenkranz is more adept in deciding sets, securing 67% of them to Stewart’s 56% over the last 12 months.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Recently, Rosenkranz has been more efficient in converting breakpoint opportunities, succeeding 33.09% of the time compared to Stewart’s 31.06%.

Editorial Prediction (September 14, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Rosenkranz and Stewart is set against the backdrop of closely matched statistics, though distinct edges exist.

Stewart demonstrates better performance on second serves and a stronger ability to play under pressure by saving more breakpoints. Moreover, Stewart's higher annual match win percentage suggests a slight advantage.

Conversely, Rosenkranz excels in return games and converting breakpoints, which can be pivotal in turning games around. His excellent performance in deciding sets indicates composure when the stakes are high.

Considering their playing surfaces, each has their strengths; however, the match details may tip the balance based on surface preference.

Although this match promises to be highly competitive, Stewart appears to have a slight overall edge, making him the likely winner in this encounter.